Why You Must Balance Customer Feedback and Design Innovation
Two constants pull at every designer during production: customer feedback and design innovation. On the one hand, customer satisfaction is a critical metric of a successful product. On the other hand, you know the world of design may never evolve if you only do what has been done before. And what has been done before is what the typical customer will request — a design similar to what they’ve seen somewhere else.
The world of art is built on this principle: See something and make it your own. But the truly innovative see something and ask why it matters and what happens if it’s done in other ways. They create new styles like Picasso’s portraits or Scher’s typography. And this typically involves design innovation.
Design innovation asks what people need, what technology can create this, and how can we create value from this opportunity. It combines computation thinking, design thinking, maker culture and business to discover not only the proof of concept but also the value, the market and the impact.
It is a call to charge ahead with creativity flowing to solve the world’s problems. But, sometimes, what the world asks for is neither particularly innovative nor valuable, and designers risk losing customer satisfaction by pushing too far forward.
MAYA Principle
Ray Loewry, the father of industrial design, said, “The adult public's taste is not necessarily ready to accept the logical solutions to their requirements if the solution implies too vast a departure from what they have been conditioned into accepting as the norm.” This idea informed Loewry’s MAYA principle.
MAYA stands for “Most Advanced. Yet Acceptable.” Brands like Apple and Google have steadily introduced design innovation to consumers while keeping them (mostly) happy about the changes. From the MAYA principle, you can take a few key lessons to advance design innovation.
Maintain Similarity in Visual Design
Design that attracts a user’s positive attention is, at least for a while, worth maintaining. Drastic changes can leave users with whiplash, causing outcries of “What was wrong with the way it was?” Making minor to no changes to the visual branding while furthering the technical advances can ease a customer’s perception of the changes.
Consider Apple’s iPod. As Apple advanced technology, specifically touchscreens, they maintained the circle pad that users had grown accustomed to. If you owned an iPod, you can probably imagine pushing the buttons up and down, to the left and right, even now. Though the screen grew larger until it overtook the iPod, Apple still maintained the circle, now just the size of a thumbprint, that controlled aspects of the handheld device.
Make Gradual Changes Chosen First by Needs
What drives technological innovation? In most cases, it is feedback on processes that pushes change. Consumers may want changes for aesthetics, user-friendliness and advanced abilities, but what they need may be better systems, faster service or functionality. The most innovative can see what a consumer wants before they demand it and set up what they need to eventually meet that want.
Here we can look at the story of a little online book retailer that could. Jeff Bezos had serious FOMO when it came to the internet boom, and after research, decided to set up shop as an online bookstore. That bookstore has been anticipating customer needs ever since, but the changes have always been gradual in their delivery such as their shipping advances — cheaper shipping, multiple shippers, free shipping, two-day shipping, one-day shipping, and delivery in-home.
Image source: alykat via Compfight
Ensure Ease of Use
The adage, “If you have to explain it, it’s no good” can be applied to design innovation too, though perhaps not as harshly. Let’s consider saying, “If you have to explain it, it’s too complex.” People need to be able to look at the design and get it, so they can engage with it, decide how they feel about it and, ultimately, make a buying decision.
This approach to buyer empathy, which can move customers toward innovation instead of scaring them away, is founded in psychology, and specifically in Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development which shows that there are some things people can learn without help and some things that require education. The MAYA principle suggests design should remain in the “learn without help” zone when delivering something new.
Think about the now-famous PR stunt by IHOP. When they changed to IHOb in 2018 to promote their new line-up of burgers, people didn’t get it at first. Confused consumers took to social media to make jokes about the new name, and IHOP’s competition even got in on the teasing. When they reverted, everyone rejoiced, but when the dust settled, the pancake chain did not create a significant increase in the company's purchase consideration.
Image source: Michael Dunker / IHOP
Innovate While Listening to Customers
You can be a designer who sells or you can be an artist who doesn’t. That may sound harsh, but the only real difference is the ability of the designer to balance customer feedback with his or her innovative work. Being an artist who sells depends on creating works that people emotionally connect with but also financially invest in.
Yes, you can innovate while listening to your customers. As an example, we can point to the Sonic the Hedgehog debacle from 2019. Jumping on the bandwagon of updating graphics, using advanced CGI and delivering the gaming experience to the big screen, Paramount and Sega began development of a Sonic the Hedgehog movie. When the final design of Sonic was complete and shared with the world, fans lost it—and not in a good way.
Image source: Still from Official Trailer
So, Paramount did like any other big Hollywood studio that had just invested millions of dollars into a project. They ignored the outcry, shirked the idea that customers know what they want, and pushed their design into theaters.
Wait. That’s not at all what happened.
In reality, Paramount and Sega listened to the criticism,decided to invest time and money into a redesign and pushed the release date back three months. Whether their commitment to pleasing consumers pays off or not is yet to be determined, but Sonic fans were thrilled, and everyone was pleasantly surprised to have been heard.
Image source: @Castleinferno, @LiKovacs and @StillJustBarry via Twitter
Design is Compromise
Brian McKenna, designer and customer experience director, wrote, “Design is hard. We put a lot of effort into coming up with concepts...as much as we would like it, we know that not every little thing that we come up with will be implemented...At some point, we will all be asked to take what we designed and compromise to some new solution.”
Ultimately, we have to acknowledge the symbiotic relationship between designer and customer—one has a creative vision to deliver to the world, one has a product to buy. Without each other, the customer’s attention may never be captured, and the designer’s work may be forgotten.
So push the boundaries. Drive forward new design concepts. But remember: finding the right balance between what the customer wants and the future of design could make the difference between losing customer satisfaction and your design inspiring millions of designers coming up behind you.
Don’t miss anything!
Join our community of 40,000+ who receive the best in design and marketing content, weekly.
Why choose Creative-as-a-Service with Superside?
Improve your marketing performance
Get high-quality creative, ship campaigns faster and stand out from the competition.
Be more agile & responsive
Never say no to another project request. Get a hassle-free creative partner that can keep up.
Elevate your team
Allow your in-house creatives to focus on more strategic projects. Get new ideas & continuous design inspiration.
Save time & be more cost-efficient
Increase your design capacity without additional hiring and with fewer vendors to manage.
See Superside in action
Get a demo and discover how 450+ ambitious companies and 2,500 energized fans use Superside to free themselves from the shackles of limited budgets, broken processes and stretched in-house teams.